Seek Returns logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

ATR vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here's a clear look at ATR and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolATRTEM
Company NameAptarGroup, Inc.Tempus AI, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsHealth Care
GICS Industry GroupMaterialsPharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingLife Sciences Tools & Services
GICS Sub-IndustryMetal, Glass & Plastic ContainersLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization8.11 billion USD8.47 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 23, 1993June 14, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

ATR's market capitalization stands at 8.11 billion USD, while TEM's is 8.47 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATR and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATR vs. TEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATRTEM
5-Day Price Return3.30%11.19%
13-Week Price Return2.66%-21.53%
26-Week Price Return-4.75%-39.62%
52-Week Price Return-16.29%-5.01%
Month-to-Date Return-0.01%4.80%
Year-to-Date Return3.32%-19.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.53M4.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.52M4.93M
3-Month Volatility29.08%59.04%
Beta0.481.94

TEM carries a higher beta at 1.94, indicating it's more sensitive to market moves, while ATR (beta: 0.48) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATR

14.72%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
31.84%
Q3
17.53%
Median
14.55%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-3.19%

ATR's Return on Equity of 14.72% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEM

-59.95%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
22.28%
Q3
13.11%
Median
9.75%
Q1
3.24%
Min
-9.09%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -59.95%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

10.40%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
14.27%
Q3
10.40%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.79%
Min
-2.68%

ATR's Net Profit Margin of 10.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEM

-19.27%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
42.13%
Q3
19.57%
Median
11.79%
Q1
4.38%
Min
-12.54%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -19.27%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

13.97%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.40%
Median
10.29%
Q1
4.54%
Min
2.45%

An Operating Profit Margin of 13.97% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TEM

-20.83%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.96%
Q3
20.40%
Median
15.34%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-10.36%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -20.83%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATRTEM
Return on Equity (TTM)14.72%-59.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.96%-12.69%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.40%-19.27%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.97%-20.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.19%62.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

1.62

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.42
Median
1.28
Q1
1.06
Min
0.86

ATR's Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TEM

3.13

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
5.62
Q3
3.13
Median
1.79
Q1
1.14
Min
0.74

TEM's Current Ratio of 3.13 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

0.56

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.67
Median
0.94
Q1
0.40
Min
0.16

ATR's Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEM

2.52

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.73
Median
0.47
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.52, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATR

15.39

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
18.72
Q3
12.03
Median
3.65
Q1
2.45
Min
-8.05

ATR's Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TEM

-3.69

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.84
Q3
15.46
Median
3.72
Q1
0.22
Min
-3.69

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.69. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATRTEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.623.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.042.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.562.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.39-3.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolATRTEM
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)13.52%82.98%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)5.42%83.41%
3-Year Revenue CAGR4.37%58.29%
5-Year Revenue CAGR5.22%46.57%

EPS Growth

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolATRTEM
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-23.90%--
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)6.75%--
3-Year EPS CAGR17.95%--
5-Year EPS CAGR12.91%--

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATR

1.49%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.82%
Q3
4.47%
Median
3.85%
Q1
1.92%
Min
1.03%

ATR's Dividend Yield of 1.49% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company's strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.04%
Q3
0.61%
Median
0.39%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATR

30.75%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
412.50%
Q3
180.00%
Median
41.92%
Q1
24.76%
Min
10.20%

ATR's Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.75% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
91.00%
Q3
37.96%
Median
18.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATRTEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.49%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.75%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATR

20.65

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
30.96
Q3
23.66
Median
18.21
Q1
13.43
Min
3.54

ATR's P/E Ratio of 20.65 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
61.87
Q3
46.82
Median
30.04
Q1
23.14
Min
8.08

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATR

2.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.15
Q3
1.49
Median
0.94
Q1
0.66
Min
0.33

ATR's P/S Ratio of 2.15 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TEM

6.47

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
9.43
Q3
6.19
Median
4.06
Q1
2.64
Min
0.82

TEM's P/S Ratio of 6.47 is in the upper echelon for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

3.00

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.93
Q3
3.00
Median
1.88
Q1
1.33
Min
0.84

ATR's P/B Ratio of 3.00 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock's price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEM

21.38

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
8.83
Q3
5.59
Median
3.36
Q1
2.50
Min
0.87

At 21.38, TEM's P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market's valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ATR vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATRTEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.65--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.156.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.0021.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.54--