Seek Returns logo

ATR vs. SMMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATR and SMMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolATRSMMT
Company NameAptarGroup, Inc.Summit Therapeutics Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsHealth Care
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingBiotechnology
Market Capitalization9.30 billion USD19.22 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateApril 23, 1993March 5, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATR and SMMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATR vs. SMMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATRSMMT
5-Day Price Return-1.30%-5.66%
13-Week Price Return-11.09%6.20%
26-Week Price Return-1.49%29.54%
52-Week Price Return-4.86%118.53%
Month-to-Date Return-11.17%-3.87%
Year-to-Date Return-11.15%42.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.54M3.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.39M4.43M
3-Month Volatility26.60%96.39%
Beta0.58-1.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATR

15.28%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

ATR’s Return on Equity of 15.28% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SMMT

-52.22%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
77.14%
Q3
10.76%
Median
-20.08%
Q1
-42.71%
Min
-119.20%

SMMT has a negative Return on Equity of -52.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

10.84%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.84% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SMMT

-9,027.08%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
59.44%
Q3
16.21%
Median
-11.49%
Q1
-167.42%
Min
-409.07%

SMMT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -9,027.08%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

14.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.30% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SMMT

-8,108.33%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.62%
Q3
20.76%
Median
-12.41%
Q1
-181.14%
Min
-482.02%

SMMT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8,108.33%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATRSMMT
Return on Equity (TTM)15.28%-52.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.49%-41.67%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.84%-9,027.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.30%-8,108.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.32%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

ATR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SMMT

5.13

Biotechnology Industry

Max
19.31
Q3
9.38
Median
4.54
Q1
2.45
Min
0.76

SMMT’s Current Ratio of 5.13 aligns with the median group of the Biotechnology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

0.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, ATR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.40 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SMMT

0.00

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.64
Median
0.09
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

SMMT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Biotechnology industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATR

16.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.66, ATR demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SMMT

-121.35

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.91
Median
-7.81
Q1
-63.90
Min
-153.80

SMMT has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -121.35. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATRSMMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.215.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.834.94
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.400.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.66-121.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATR vs. SMMT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ATR vs. SMMT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATR

1.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Yield of 1.30% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SMMT

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMMT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATR

30.51%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.51% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SMMT

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMMT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATRSMMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.30%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.51%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATR

23.49

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

ATR’s P/E Ratio of 23.49 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SMMT

--

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.14
Q3
38.17
Median
29.01
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for SMMT is currently unavailable.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATR

2.55

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

ATR’s P/S Ratio of 2.55 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SMMT

19,902.10

Biotechnology Industry

Max
76.98
Q3
36.53
Median
9.49
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 19,902.10, SMMT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Biotechnology industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

3.83

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

ATR’s P/B Ratio of 3.83 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SMMT

60.92

Biotechnology Industry

Max
20.53
Q3
9.76
Median
4.77
Q1
2.49
Min
0.59

At 60.92, SMMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Biotechnology industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ATR vs. SMMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATRSMMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.49--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.5519,902.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.8360.92
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.92--