Seek Returns logo

ATR vs. MDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATR and MDT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolATRMDT
Company NameAptarGroup, Inc.Medtronic plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorMaterialsHealth Care
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization9.30 billion USD119.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 23, 1993May 2, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATR and MDT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATR vs. MDT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATRMDT
5-Day Price Return-1.30%1.35%
13-Week Price Return-11.09%7.19%
26-Week Price Return-1.49%1.11%
52-Week Price Return-4.86%9.90%
Month-to-Date Return-11.17%3.30%
Year-to-Date Return-11.15%16.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.54M9.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.39M7.63M
3-Month Volatility26.60%19.48%
Beta0.580.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATR

15.28%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

ATR’s Return on Equity of 15.28% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MDT

9.62%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

10.84%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.84% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MDT

13.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.90% places MDT in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

14.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.30% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MDT

17.76%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

MDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.76% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATRMDT
Return on Equity (TTM)15.28%9.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.49%5.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.84%13.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.30%17.76%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.32%65.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

ATR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MDT

1.85

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

MDT’s Current Ratio of 1.85 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

0.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, ATR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.40 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MDT

0.59

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATR

16.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.66, ATR demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MDT

10.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATRMDT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.211.85
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.831.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.400.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.6610.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATR vs. MDT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ATR vs. MDT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATR

1.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Yield of 1.30% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MDT

3.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.01%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATR

30.51%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.51% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MDT

76.98%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 76.98% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATRMDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.30%3.01%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.51%76.98%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATR

23.49

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

ATR’s P/E Ratio of 23.49 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MDT

25.55

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, MDT’s P/E Ratio of 25.55 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATR

2.55

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

ATR’s P/S Ratio of 2.55 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MDT

3.55

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

3.83

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

ATR’s P/B Ratio of 3.83 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MDT

2.25

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ATR vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATRMDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.4925.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.553.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.832.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.9222.97