Seek Returns logo

ATR vs. LH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATR and LH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

LH’s market capitalization of 21.91 billion USD is significantly greater than ATR’s 10.64 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.59 for ATR and 0.79 for LH, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolATRLH
Company NameAptarGroup, Inc.Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
CountryUSUS
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Equipment & Services
CEOStephan B. TandaAdam H. Schechter
Price161.04 USD261.89 USD
Market Cap10.64 billion USD21.91 billion USD
Beta0.590.79
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 23, 1993March 29, 1990
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATR and LH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATR vs. LH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ATR

14.87%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
26.65%
Q3
13.00%
Median
1.08%
Q1
-8.11%
Min
-38.20%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, ATR’s Return on Equity of 14.87% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LH

8.98%

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
34.18%
Q3
15.28%
Median
-14.21%
Q1
-42.39%
Min
-57.31%

LH’s Return on Equity of 8.98% is on par with the norm for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ATR

11.90%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
20.14%
Q3
7.36%
Median
1.97%
Q1
-6.22%
Min
-20.00%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, ATR’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.90% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

LH

5.48%

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
9.06%
Q3
6.37%
Median
4.11%
Q1
-1.97%
Min
-14.49%

LH’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.48% is in line with the norm for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ATR

10.42%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
28.95%
Q3
11.24%
Median
-2.83%
Q1
-12.85%
Min
-26.41%

ATR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LH

5.55%

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
6.18%
Median
-19.68%
Q1
-59.13%
Min
-101.82%

LH’s Net Profit Margin of 5.55% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Medical - Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ATR

14.17%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
32.10%
Q3
16.03%
Median
2.28%
Q1
-7.96%
Min
-26.84%

ATR’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.17% is around the midpoint for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LH

8.37%

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.01%
Q3
10.28%
Median
6.69%
Q1
-15.48%
Min
-54.12%

LH’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.37% is around the midpoint for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATRLH
Return on Equity (TTM)14.87%8.98%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.18%4.15%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.90%5.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.42%5.55%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.17%8.37%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.41%27.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ATR

1.25

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
4.57
Median
2.64
Q1
1.81
Min
1.10

ATR’s Current Ratio of 1.25 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LH

1.84

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
11.42
Q3
5.56
Median
1.98
Q1
1.65
Min
1.10

LH’s Current Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the median group of the Medical - Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ATR

0.41

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.16
Min
0.03

ATR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 is typical for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LH

0.78

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.69
Q3
1.01
Median
0.65
Q1
0.39
Min
0.02

LH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ATR

11.17

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
25.04
Q3
8.80
Median
3.66
Q1
-3.85
Min
-11.93

ATR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.17 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LH

6.83

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
9.03
Q3
7.93
Median
6.83
Q1
5.29
Min
3.75

LH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.83 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATRLH
Current Ratio (TTM)1.251.84
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.851.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.410.78
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.230.37
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.193.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.176.83

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ATR and LH. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ATR

1.12%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
4.02%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.12%, ATR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LH

1.10%

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.11%
Q3
0.72%
Median
0.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.10%, LH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ATR

31.58%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
76.77%
Q3
11.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.58% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LH

33.20%

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
987.07%
Q3
271.66%
Median
16.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.20% is within the typical range for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATRLH
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.12%1.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.58%33.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ATR

28.83

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
45.65
Q3
44.10
Median
35.47
Q1
29.60
Min
21.65

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, ATR’s P/E Ratio of 28.83 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LH

29.96

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
29.81
Q3
26.64
Median
23.46
Q1
20.29
Min
17.12

At 29.96, LH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ATR

2.54

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
5.80
Q3
3.68
Median
2.56
Q1
1.87
Min
0.22

ATR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.54 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

LH

4.04

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.55
Median
1.08
Q1
0.70
Min
0.33

LH’s Forward PEG Ratio of 4.04 is exceptionally high for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ATR

2.99

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
12.87
Q3
6.95
Median
3.45
Q1
2.24
Min
0.71

ATR’s P/S Ratio of 2.99 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LH

1.66

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
7.06
Q3
3.65
Median
1.53
Q1
1.38
Min
1.33

LH’s P/S Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ATR

4.18

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
5.48
Median
3.37
Q1
1.95
Min
0.65

ATR’s P/B Ratio of 4.18 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LH

2.64

Medical - Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.29
Q3
4.15
Median
2.05
Q1
1.39
Min
1.12

LH’s P/B Ratio of 2.64 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ATR vs. LH: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATRLH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)28.8329.96
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.544.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.991.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.182.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)29.6719.02
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.8015.58
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.252.13