Seek Returns logo

ATR vs. ICLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATR and ICLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolATRICLR
Company NameAptarGroup, Inc.ICON Public Limited Company
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorMaterialsHealth Care
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization8.67 billion USD14.50 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 23, 1993May 15, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATR and ICLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATR vs. ICLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATRICLR
5-Day Price Return-1.18%-3.36%
13-Week Price Return-17.60%23.88%
26-Week Price Return-11.48%13.98%
52-Week Price Return-17.06%-35.78%
Month-to-Date Return-1.53%6.56%
Year-to-Date Return-16.23%-11.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.39M0.98M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.43M1.23M
3-Month Volatility24.82%62.85%
Beta0.531.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATR

15.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

ATR’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ICLR

8.28%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

ICLR’s Return on Equity of 8.28% is on par with the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

10.86%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

ATR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ICLR

9.82%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

ICLR’s Net Profit Margin of 9.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

14.26%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.26% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ICLR

12.50%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

ICLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.50% is around the midpoint for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATRICLR
Return on Equity (TTM)15.30%8.28%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.50%4.71%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.86%9.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.26%12.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.32%28.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

ATR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ICLR

1.29

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

ICLR’s Current Ratio of 1.29 falls into the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

0.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, ATR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.40 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ICLR

0.36

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

ICLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATR

16.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.67, ATR demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ICLR

4.80

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

ICLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.80 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATRICLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.211.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.831.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.400.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.674.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATR vs. ICLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ATR vs. ICLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATR

1.38%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Yield of 1.38% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ICLR

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ICLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATR

30.61%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.61% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ICLR

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ICLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATRICLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.38%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.61%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATR

22.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

A P/E Ratio of 22.12 places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ICLR

18.30

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, ICLR’s P/E Ratio of 18.30 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATR

2.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 2.40, ATR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Containers & Packaging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ICLR

1.80

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, ICLR’s P/S Ratio of 1.80 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

3.83

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

ATR’s P/B Ratio of 3.83 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ICLR

1.21

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

ICLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is in the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ATR vs. ICLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATRICLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.1218.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.401.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.831.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.3514.69