Seek Returns logo

ATR vs. HLN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATR and HLN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ATR is a standard domestic listing, while HLN trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolATRHLN
Company NameAptarGroup, Inc.Haleon plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization8.67 billion USD40.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 23, 1993July 25, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATR and HLN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATR vs. HLN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATRHLN
5-Day Price Return-1.18%-0.84%
13-Week Price Return-17.60%-11.02%
26-Week Price Return-11.48%-14.92%
52-Week Price Return-17.06%-12.92%
Month-to-Date Return-1.53%-0.63%
Year-to-Date Return-16.23%-12.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.39M16.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.43M14.61M
3-Month Volatility24.82%19.16%
Beta0.530.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATR

15.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

ATR’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HLN

3.26%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-10.45%

HLN’s Return on Equity of 3.26% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

10.86%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

ATR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

HLN

12.84%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
10.84%
Median
9.29%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-0.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.84% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

14.26%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.26% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HLN

19.64%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.46%
Median
12.80%
Q1
8.01%
Min
2.98%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.64% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATRHLN
Return on Equity (TTM)15.30%3.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.50%1.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.86%12.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.26%19.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.32%60.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

ATR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HLN

0.87

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.73
Median
1.76
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

HLN’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

0.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, ATR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.40 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HLN

0.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.30
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

HLN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATR

16.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.67, ATR demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

HLN

8.00

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-3.28

HLN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATRHLN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.210.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.830.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.400.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.678.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATR vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ATR vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATR

1.38%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Yield of 1.38% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HLN

0.72%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
2.70%
Median
1.98%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

HLN’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is in the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATR

30.61%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.61% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HLN

954.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
137.27%
Median
70.48%
Q1
51.10%
Min
0.00%

At 954.40%, HLN’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATRHLN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.38%0.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.61%954.40%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATR

22.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

A P/E Ratio of 22.12 places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HLN

20.40

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
31.71
Median
22.50
Q1
20.20
Min
11.79

HLN’s P/E Ratio of 20.40 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATR

2.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 2.40, ATR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Containers & Packaging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HLN

2.62

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.35
Median
1.92
Q1
1.18
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 2.62, HLN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Personal Care Products industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

3.83

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

ATR’s P/B Ratio of 3.83 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HLN

2.11

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.84
Q1
1.70
Min
1.12

HLN’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Personal Care Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ATR vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATRHLN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.1220.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.402.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.832.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.3513.68