Seek Returns logo

ATO vs. SMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATO and SMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolATOSMR
Company NameAtmos Energy CorporationNuScale Power Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesIndustrials
GICS IndustryGas UtilitiesElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization27.32 billion USD5.37 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 28, 1983March 1, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATO and SMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATO vs. SMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATOSMR
5-Day Price Return0.38%3.97%
13-Week Price Return11.76%12.21%
26-Week Price Return10.10%163.93%
52-Week Price Return22.33%232.58%
Month-to-Date Return-0.33%9.75%
Year-to-Date Return22.20%120.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.73M21.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.86M15.27M
3-Month Volatility14.74%92.42%
Beta0.762.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATO

9.00%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
17.49%
Q3
12.97%
Median
9.25%
Q1
8.48%
Min
5.45%

ATO’s Return on Equity of 9.00% is on par with the norm for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SMR

-22.81%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

SMR has a negative Return on Equity of -22.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATO

25.04%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
25.04%
Q3
13.75%
Median
7.65%
Q1
5.38%
Min
3.02%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.04% places ATO in the upper quartile for the Gas Utilities industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SMR

-221.07%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

SMR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -221.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATO

33.00%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
50.29%
Q3
25.97%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.88%
Min
4.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.00% places ATO in the upper quartile for the Gas Utilities industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SMR

-233.90%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

SMR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -233.90%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATOSMR
Return on Equity (TTM)9.00%-22.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.35%-24.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.04%-221.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.00%-233.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%71.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATO

1.37

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.54
Median
0.93
Q1
0.67
Min
0.37

ATO’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Gas Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SMR

4.22

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

SMR’s Current Ratio of 4.22 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATO

0.67

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.41
Median
0.97
Q1
0.54
Min
0.13

ATO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SMR

0.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, SMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATO

8.53

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
11.25
Median
8.09
Q1
3.86
Min
1.26

ATO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SMR

-58.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

SMR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -58.59. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATOSMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.374.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.254.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.53-58.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATO vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ATO vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATO

1.97%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
9.08%
Q3
5.59%
Median
3.79%
Q1
1.84%
Min
0.00%

ATO’s Dividend Yield of 1.97% is consistent with its peers in the Gas Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATO

46.51%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
132.63%
Q3
88.31%
Median
68.88%
Q1
46.67%
Min
18.85%

ATO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.51% is in the lower quartile for the Gas Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATOSMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.97%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.51%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATO

23.66

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
24.48
Q3
16.64
Median
11.66
Q1
9.76
Min
7.26

A P/E Ratio of 23.66 places ATO in the upper quartile for the Gas Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SMR

--

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

P/E Ratio data for SMR is currently unavailable.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATO

5.93

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
5.65
Q3
2.63
Median
1.09
Q1
0.59
Min
0.30

With a P/S Ratio of 5.93, ATO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Gas Utilities industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SMR

203.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

With a P/S Ratio of 203.63, SMR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATO

1.83

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
2.57
Q3
1.88
Median
1.41
Q1
0.94
Min
0.42

ATO’s P/B Ratio of 1.83 is within the conventional range for the Gas Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SMR

16.24

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

At 16.24, SMR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ATO vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATOSMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.66--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.93203.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.8316.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)329.03--