Seek Returns logo

ATO vs. NJR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATO and NJR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolATONJR
Company NameAtmos Energy CorporationNew Jersey Resources Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryGas UtilitiesGas Utilities
Market Capitalization26.67 billion USD4.75 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 28, 1983March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATO and NJR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATO vs. NJR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATONJR
5-Day Price Return0.41%-0.06%
13-Week Price Return7.64%3.43%
26-Week Price Return10.47%-1.09%
52-Week Price Return28.69%3.77%
Month-to-Date Return6.55%3.01%
Year-to-Date Return19.29%1.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.85M0.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.96M0.62M
3-Month Volatility15.15%14.69%
Beta0.740.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATO

9.00%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
18.18%
Q3
12.37%
Median
9.24%
Q1
6.51%
Min
1.38%

ATO’s Return on Equity of 9.00% is on par with the norm for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NJR

17.49%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
18.18%
Q3
12.37%
Median
9.24%
Q1
6.51%
Min
1.38%

In the upper quartile for the Gas Utilities industry, NJR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATO

25.04%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
14.23%
Q3
10.38%
Median
6.30%
Q1
3.98%
Min
1.91%

ATO’s Net Profit Margin of 25.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Gas Utilities industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

NJR

32.64%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
14.23%
Q3
10.38%
Median
6.30%
Q1
3.98%
Min
1.91%

NJR’s Net Profit Margin of 32.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Gas Utilities industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATO

33.00%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
48.27%
Q3
23.40%
Median
8.99%
Q1
6.80%
Min
-2.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.00% places ATO in the upper quartile for the Gas Utilities industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NJR

48.73%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
48.27%
Q3
23.40%
Median
8.99%
Q1
6.80%
Min
-2.18%

NJR’s Operating Profit Margin of 48.73% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Gas Utilities industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATONJR
Return on Equity (TTM)9.00%17.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.35%5.73%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.04%32.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.00%48.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%-32.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATO

1.37

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.53
Median
0.95
Q1
0.68
Min
0.43

ATO’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Gas Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NJR

0.76

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.53
Median
0.95
Q1
0.68
Min
0.43

NJR’s Current Ratio of 0.76 aligns with the median group of the Gas Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATO

0.67

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.39
Median
1.01
Q1
0.58
Min
0.13

ATO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NJR

1.40

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.39
Median
1.01
Q1
0.58
Min
0.13

NJR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Gas Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.40. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATO

8.53

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
11.25
Median
8.09
Q1
3.86
Min
1.26

ATO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NJR

4.04

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
11.25
Median
8.09
Q1
3.86
Min
1.26

NJR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATONJR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.370.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.250.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.671.40
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.534.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATO vs. NJR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ATO vs. NJR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATO

2.02%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
11.34%
Q3
6.37%
Median
3.90%
Q1
1.99%
Min
0.00%

ATO’s Dividend Yield of 2.02% is consistent with its peers in the Gas Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NJR

3.71%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
11.34%
Q3
6.37%
Median
3.90%
Q1
1.99%
Min
0.00%

NJR’s Dividend Yield of 3.71% is consistent with its peers in the Gas Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATO

46.51%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
200.45%
Q3
112.45%
Median
75.14%
Q1
45.50%
Min
18.85%

ATO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.51% is within the typical range for the Gas Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NJR

30.79%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
200.45%
Q3
112.45%
Median
75.14%
Q1
45.50%
Min
18.85%

NJR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.79% is in the lower quartile for the Gas Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATONJR
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.02%3.71%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.51%30.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATO

23.01

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
25.10
Q3
19.98
Median
12.83
Q1
10.31
Min
7.43

A P/E Ratio of 23.01 places ATO in the upper quartile for the Gas Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NJR

11.55

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
25.10
Q3
19.98
Median
12.83
Q1
10.31
Min
7.43

NJR’s P/E Ratio of 11.55 is within the middle range for the Gas Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATO

5.76

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
5.56
Q3
2.60
Median
1.11
Q1
0.62
Min
0.33

With a P/S Ratio of 5.76, ATO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Gas Utilities industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NJR

3.77

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
5.56
Q3
2.60
Median
1.11
Q1
0.62
Min
0.33

NJR’s P/S Ratio of 3.77 is in the upper echelon for the Gas Utilities industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATO

1.83

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.96
Median
1.31
Q1
0.94
Min
0.36

ATO’s P/B Ratio of 1.83 is within the conventional range for the Gas Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NJR

1.86

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.96
Median
1.31
Q1
0.94
Min
0.36

NJR’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is within the conventional range for the Gas Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ATO vs. NJR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Gas Utilities industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATONJR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.0111.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.763.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.831.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)319.9115.96