ATI vs. PONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ATI and PONY, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ATI dominates in value with a market cap of 10.60 billion USD, eclipsing PONY’s 6.25 billion USD by roughly 1.70×.
PONY carries a higher beta at 4.02, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ATI remains steadier at 1.01.
| Symbol | ATI | PONY |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ATI Inc. | Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares |
| Country | US | CN |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Rental & Leasing Services |
| CEO | Ms. Kimberly A. Fields | Dr. Jun Peng |
| Price | 75.17 USD | 17.29 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.60 billion USD | 6.25 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.01 | 4.02 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | November 29, 1999 | Invalid Date |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ATI and PONY over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ATI and PONY based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- PONY shows a negative P/E of -12.16, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ATI at 24.59 trades on solid profitability.
- PONY shows a negative forward PEG of -0.44, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ATI at 1.35 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- PONY reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -70.25, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ATI at 31.87 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ATI | PONY |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 24.59 | -12.16 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.35 | -0.44 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.38 | 114.56 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.23 | 3.31 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 31.87 | -70.25 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 16.24 | -20.65 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.69 | 104.98 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 36.13 | -64.37 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ATI nor PONY currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ATI | PONY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ATI and PONY, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ATI meets its interest obligations (ratio 7.80). In stark contrast, PONY’s negative ratio (-48.96) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ATI | PONY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.53 | 11.77 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.30 | 11.77 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.01 | 0.01 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.37 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.80 | -48.96 |