Seek Returns logo

ATI vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATI and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolATIMMM
Company NameATI Inc.3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization10.16 billion USD82.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 29, 1999January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATI and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATI vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATIMMM
5-Day Price Return1.58%-1.21%
13-Week Price Return-1.94%0.40%
26-Week Price Return18.58%4.05%
52-Week Price Return12.83%21.77%
Month-to-Date Return-4.20%3.71%
Year-to-Date Return33.92%19.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.78M3.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.05M3.45M
3-Month Volatility43.64%23.14%
Beta1.321.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATI

23.01%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, ATI’s Return on Equity of 23.01% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATI

9.26%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

ATI’s Net Profit Margin of 9.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATI

14.62%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

ATI’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.62% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATIMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)23.01%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.15%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.26%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.62%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.35%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATI

2.52

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

ATI’s Current Ratio of 2.52 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATI

1.08

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

ATI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Metals & Mining industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATI

5.45

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

ATI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.45 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATIMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.521.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.111.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.083.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.45-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATI vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ATI vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATI

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ATI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATI

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

ATI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATIMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATI

23.48

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

ATI’s P/E Ratio of 23.48 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATI

2.17

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

ATI’s P/S Ratio of 2.17 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATI

6.99

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 6.99, ATI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ATI vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATIMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.4820.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.173.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.9918.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.2930.86