Seek Returns logo

ATI vs. HUBB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ATI and HUBB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

HUBB stands out with 20.23 billion USD in market value—about 1.91× ATI’s market cap of 10.60 billion USD.

With betas of 1.01 for ATI and 0.96 for HUBB, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

SymbolATIHUBB
Company NameATI Inc.Hubbell Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryManufacturing - Metal FabricationElectrical Equipment & Parts
CEOMs. Kimberly A. FieldsMr. Gerben W. Bakker
Price75.17 USD379.04 USD
Market Cap10.60 billion USD20.23 billion USD
Beta1.010.96
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 29, 1999June 5, 1972
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ATI and HUBB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ATI and HUBB, please refer to the table below.

SymbolATIHUBB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.5925.65
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.351.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.383.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.236.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)31.8726.26
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)16.2416.91
EV-to-Sales (TTM)2.693.91
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)36.1328.42

Dividend Comparison

ATI offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while HUBB provides a 1.34% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.

SymbolATIHUBB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.34%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ATI and HUBB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • HUBB posts a quick ratio of 0.73, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ATI at 1.30 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
SymbolATIHUBB
Current Ratio (TTM)2.531.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.300.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.010.61
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.370.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.8021.00