Seek Returns logo

ATI vs. BA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ATI and BA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

BA stands out with 153.22 billion USD in market value—about 14.45× ATI’s market cap of 10.60 billion USD.

With betas of 1.01 for ATI and 1.41 for BA, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

SymbolATIBA
Company NameATI Inc.The Boeing Company
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryManufacturing - Metal FabricationAerospace & Defense
CEOMs. Kimberly A. FieldsMr. Robert K. Ortberg
Price75.17 USD203.21 USD
Market Cap10.60 billion USD153.22 billion USD
Beta1.011.41
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 29, 1999January 2, 1962
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ATI and BA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ATI and BA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

  • BA shows a negative P/E of -13.30, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ATI at 24.59 trades on solid profitability.
  • BA shows a negative forward PEG of -6.09, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ATI at 1.35 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
  • BA carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -46.04, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ATI (P/B 5.23) has positive book value.
  • BA reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -12.01, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ATI at 31.87 maintains positive cash flow.
SymbolATIBA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.59-13.30
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.35-6.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.382.21
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.23-46.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)31.87-12.01
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)16.24-27.97
EV-to-Sales (TTM)2.692.83
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)36.13-15.42

Dividend Comparison

Neither ATI nor BA currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

SymbolATIBA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ATI and BA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • BA posts a quick ratio of 0.37, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ATI at 1.30 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
  • BA has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -16.13), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas ATI at 1.01 preserves healthier equity coverage.
  • ATI meets its interest obligations (ratio 7.80). In stark contrast, BA’s negative ratio (-3.55) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
SymbolATIBA
Current Ratio (TTM)2.531.23
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.300.37
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.01-16.13
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.370.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.80-3.55