Seek Returns logo

ATAT vs. IHG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATAT and IHG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

IHG’s market capitalization of 18.46 billion USD is significantly greater than ATAT’s 4.67 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.84 for ATAT and 0.89 for IHG, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

ATAT and IHG are both American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies without directly engaging with overseas stock exchanges.

SymbolATATIHG
Company NameAtour Lifestyle Holdings LimitedInterContinental Hotels Group PLC
CountryCNGB
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryTravel LodgingTravel Lodging
CEOHaijun WangElie Wajih Maalouf
Price33.79 USD119.66 USD
Market Cap4.67 billion USD18.46 billion USD
Beta0.840.89
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateNovember 11, 2022April 10, 2003
ADRYesYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATAT and IHG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATAT vs. IHG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ATAT

43.78%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
54.87%
Q3
39.53%
Median
21.82%
Q1
-42.75%
Min
-92.80%

In the upper quartile for the Travel Lodging industry, ATAT’s Return on Equity of 43.78% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IHG

-27.81%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
54.87%
Q3
39.53%
Median
21.82%
Q1
-42.75%
Min
-92.80%

IHG has a negative Return on Equity of -27.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their ROE against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

ATAT

20.52%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
17.37%
Median
15.46%
Q1
6.72%
Min
-0.59%

In the upper quartile for the Travel Lodging industry, ATAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 20.52% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

IHG

22.47%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
17.37%
Median
15.46%
Q1
6.72%
Min
-0.59%

In the upper quartile for the Travel Lodging industry, IHG’s Return on Invested Capital of 22.47% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their ROIC against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

ATAT

16.41%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
19.75%
Q3
16.41%
Median
12.76%
Q1
11.98%
Min
9.75%

ATAT’s Net Profit Margin of 16.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Travel Lodging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IHG

12.76%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
19.75%
Q3
16.41%
Median
12.76%
Q1
11.98%
Min
9.75%

IHG’s Net Profit Margin of 12.76% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Travel Lodging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

ATAT

21.51%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
30.55%
Q3
21.77%
Median
21.15%
Q1
15.15%
Min
15.10%

ATAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.51% is around the midpoint for the Travel Lodging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IHG

21.15%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
30.55%
Q3
21.77%
Median
21.15%
Q1
15.15%
Min
15.10%

IHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.15% is around the midpoint for the Travel Lodging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATATIHG
Return on Equity (TTM)43.78%-27.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.93%13.23%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)20.52%22.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.41%12.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.51%21.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.79%29.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ATAT

2.29

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.98
Median
0.96
Q1
0.83
Min
0.83

ATAT’s Current Ratio of 2.29 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Travel Lodging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IHG

0.97

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.98
Median
0.96
Q1
0.83
Min
0.83

IHG’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Travel Lodging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ATAT

0.53

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
3.27
Median
2.12
Q1
1.13
Min
0.53

Falling into the lower quartile for the Travel Lodging industry, ATAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IHG

-1.60

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
3.27
Median
2.12
Q1
1.13
Min
0.53

IHG has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -1.60, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ATAT

541.77

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
7.05
Median
5.31
Q1
4.28
Min
4.07

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 541.77, ATAT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Travel Lodging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

IHG

5.13

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
7.05
Median
5.31
Q1
4.28
Min
4.07

IHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.13 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Travel Lodging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATATIHG
Current Ratio (TTM)2.290.97
Quick Ratio (TTM)2.230.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.53-1.60
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.220.78
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.782.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)541.775.13

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ATAT and IHG. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ATAT

3.82%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
3.94%
Q3
1.93%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.43%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.82%, ATAT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Travel Lodging industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IHG

0.93%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
3.94%
Q3
1.93%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.43%
Min
0.00%

IHG’s Dividend Yield of 0.93% is consistent with its peers in the Travel Lodging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ATAT

34.58%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
114.17%
Q3
36.83%
Median
28.47%
Q1
9.43%
Min
0.00%

ATAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.58% is within the typical range for the Travel Lodging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IHG

41.24%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
114.17%
Q3
36.83%
Median
28.47%
Q1
9.43%
Min
0.00%

IHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 41.24% is in the upper quartile for the Travel Lodging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATATIHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.82%0.93%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)34.58%41.24%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ATAT

26.60

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
40.59
Q3
29.79
Median
22.44
Q1
18.46
Min
2.45

ATAT’s P/E Ratio of 26.60 is within the middle range for the Travel Lodging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IHG

30.30

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
40.59
Q3
29.79
Median
22.44
Q1
18.46
Min
2.45

A P/E Ratio of 30.30 places IHG in the upper quartile for the Travel Lodging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ATAT

1.18

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.92
Median
1.46
Q1
0.89
Min
0.19

ATAT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.18 is within the middle range of its peers in the Travel Lodging industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

IHG

2.61

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.92
Median
1.46
Q1
0.89
Min
0.19

IHG’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.61 is exceptionally high for the Travel Lodging industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ATAT

4.35

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
5.59
Q3
4.22
Median
3.60
Q1
2.95
Min
1.17

ATAT’s P/S Ratio of 4.35 is in the upper echelon for the Travel Lodging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IHG

3.70

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
5.59
Q3
4.22
Median
3.60
Q1
2.95
Min
1.17

IHG’s P/S Ratio of 3.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Travel Lodging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ATAT

10.19

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
11.01
Q3
10.16
Median
6.87
Q1
3.05
Min
0.61

ATAT’s P/B Ratio of 10.19 is in the upper tier for the Travel Lodging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IHG

-8.23

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
11.01
Q3
10.16
Median
6.87
Q1
3.05
Min
0.61

IHG has a negative P/B Ratio of -8.23, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

ATAT vs. IHG: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Travel Lodging industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATATIHG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)26.6030.30
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.182.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)4.353.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)10.19-8.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)21.9828.16
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)18.1416.77
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4.174.24