Seek Returns logo

ASX vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASX and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

RBLX’s market capitalization of 70.26 billion USD is significantly greater than ASX’s 22.53 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

RBLX carries a higher beta at 1.56, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ASX (beta: 0.92) exhibits greater stability.

ASX trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RBLX is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASXRBLX
Company NameASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.Roblox Corporation
CountryTWUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
CEOHung-Pen ChangDavid Baszucki
Price10.37 USD103.59 USD
Market Cap22.53 billion USD70.26 billion USD
Beta0.921.56
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateOctober 2, 2000March 10, 2021
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASX and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASX vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASX

11.03%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASX’s Return on Equity of 11.03% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-417.21%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
22.45%
Q3
13.61%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-70.13%
Min
-121.78%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -417.21%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASX

5.98%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

ASX’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.98% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

RBLX

-27.10%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
17.62%
Q3
11.24%
Median
1.98%
Q1
-22.67%
Min
-64.64%

RBLX has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -27.10%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASX

5.61%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

ASX’s Net Profit Margin of 5.61% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-22.94%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.20%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.20%
Q1
-7.35%
Min
-22.94%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.94%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASX

7.01%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

ASX’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.01% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-26.48%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.10%
Q3
17.15%
Median
5.89%
Q1
-19.43%
Min
-26.48%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -26.48%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASXRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)11.03%-417.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.43%-11.81%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.98%-27.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.61%-22.94%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.01%-26.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.32%77.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASX

1.04

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASX’s Current Ratio of 1.04 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RBLX

1.02

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
2.77
Median
1.19
Q1
0.82
Min
0.01

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASX

0.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RBLX

5.81

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
1.14
Median
0.31
Q1
0.17
Min
0.09

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.81, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASX

7.79

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

ASX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RBLX

-25.09

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
20.61
Q3
4.69
Median
-1.31
Q1
-20.23
Min
-25.09

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -25.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASXRBLX
Current Ratio (TTM)1.041.02
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.821.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.725.81
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.290.24
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.32-1.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.79-25.09

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASX and RBLX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASX

3.60%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.60%, ASX offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RBLX

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
0.36%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASX

65.52%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.52% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RBLX

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
106.44%
Q3
13.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASXRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.60%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)65.52%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASX

18.57

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASX’s P/E Ratio of 18.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RBLX

-79.08

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
36.87
Q3
20.95
Median
12.73
Q1
7.31
Min
3.67

RBLX has a negative P/E Ratio of -79.08. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASX

0.73

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

RBLX

1.72

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
2.24
Median
1.87
Q1
1.76
Min
1.76

RBLX’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.72 is below the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This is a strong indicator that the stock may be undervalued, as its price appears low given its future growth prospects.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASX

1.05

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASX’s P/S Ratio of 1.05 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RBLX

18.32

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
6.29
Median
3.76
Q1
1.02
Min
0.66

With a P/S Ratio of 18.32, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASX

2.04

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

ASX’s P/B Ratio of 2.04 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RBLX

223.95

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
6.47
Q3
6.47
Median
4.48
Q1
1.29
Min
0.36

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry.

ASX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASXRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)18.57-79.08
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.731.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.0518.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.04223.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-63.4080.12
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)7.08-115.38
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.2918.49