ASTS vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and TTWO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
TTWO stands out with 40.02 billion USD in market value—about 5.12× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.
ASTS’s beta of 2.04 points to much larger expected swings compared to TTWO’s calmer 1.09, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ASTS | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. Strauss H. Zelnick Esq., J.D. |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 226.76 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 40.02 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 1.09 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | April 15, 1997 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and TTWO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and TTWO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither ASTS nor TTWO turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -16.37 and -8.95, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- TTWO shows a negative forward PEG of -0.30, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ASTS at 8.02 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- ASTS and TTWO both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -21.60 and -80.92, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | ASTS | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | -8.95 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | -0.30 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 7.10 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 18.75 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | -80.92 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | -11.55 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 7.13 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | -81.17 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTS nor TTWO currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ASTS | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and TTWO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- TTWO’s current ratio of 0.78 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ASTS at 10.62 maintains healthy liquidity.
- TTWO posts a quick ratio of 0.78, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ASTS at 10.62 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- ASTS meets its interest obligations (ratio 39.54). In stark contrast, TTWO’s negative ratio (-86.19) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ASTS | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 0.78 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 0.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.75 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.17 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -86.19 |