ASTS vs. SOUN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and SOUN, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASTS dominates in value with a market cap of 7.81 billion USD, eclipsing SOUN’s 3.80 billion USD by roughly 2.05×.
With betas of 2.04 for ASTS and 2.99 for SOUN, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ASTS | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | SoundHound AI, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Dr. Keyvan Mohajer |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 9.47 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 3.80 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 2.99 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | April 28, 2022 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and SOUN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and SOUN based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither ASTS nor SOUN turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -16.37 and -19.79, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- ASTS and SOUN both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -21.60 and -35.62, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | ASTS | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | -19.79 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | 0.04 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 37.22 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 9.40 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | -35.62 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | -20.15 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 34.86 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | -33.36 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTS nor SOUN currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ASTS | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and SOUN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASTS meets its interest obligations (ratio 39.54). In stark contrast, SOUN’s negative ratio (-30.16) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ASTS | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 4.92 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 4.92 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -30.16 |