ASTS vs. SNOW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and SNOW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
SNOW stands out with 59.76 billion USD in market value—about 7.65× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.
ASTS’s beta of 2.04 points to much larger expected swings compared to SNOW’s calmer 1.11, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ASTS | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Snowflake Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. Sridhar Ramaswamy Ph.D. |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 179.12 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 59.76 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 1.11 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | September 16, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and SNOW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and SNOW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither ASTS nor SNOW turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -16.37 and -46.18, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- SNOW shows a negative forward PEG of -1.25, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ASTS at 8.02 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, SNOW (P/FCF 66.40) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ASTS | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | -46.18 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | -1.25 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 16.48 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 19.25 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | 66.40 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | -45.85 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 16.50 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | 66.46 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTS nor SNOW currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ASTS | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and SNOW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASTS meets its interest obligations (ratio 39.54). In stark contrast, SNOW’s negative ratio (-1054.32) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ASTS | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 1.78 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 1.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.87 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.30 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -1054.32 |