ASTS vs. PLTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and PLTR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
PLTR stands out with 284.56 billion USD in market value—about 36.43× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.
With betas of 2.04 for ASTS and 2.68 for PLTR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ASTS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Palantir Technologies Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Dr. Alexander C. Karp J.D. |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 120.58 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 284.56 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 2.68 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | September 30, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and PLTR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and PLTR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ASTS has a negative P/E (-16.37) due to recent losses. In contrast, PLTR commands a premium multiple of 496.25, signaling strong market confidence in its future earnings growth to justify this high valuation.
- ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, PLTR (P/FCF 215.84) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ASTS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | 496.25 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | 28.93 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 91.35 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 52.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | 215.84 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | 661.99 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 91.11 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | 215.27 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTS nor PLTR currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ASTS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and PLTR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASTS (at 39.54) covers its interest payments, while PLTR shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | ASTS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 6.49 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 6.49 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -- |