Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. PANW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and PANW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

PANW’s market capitalization of 134.57 billion USD is significantly greater than ASTS’s 15.96 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ASTS’s beta of 2.02 points to significantly higher volatility compared to PANW (beta: 0.97), suggesting ASTS has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolASTSPANW
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOAbel AvellanNikesh Arora
Price45.6 USD201.82 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD134.57 billion USD
Beta2.020.97
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019July 20, 2012
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and PANW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. PANW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PANW

20.06%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

PANW’s Return on Equity of 20.06% is on par with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

PANW

6.24%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

PANW’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.24% is in line with the norm for the Software - Infrastructure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PANW

13.95%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

PANW’s Net Profit Margin of 13.95% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PANW

11.09%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

PANW’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.09% is around the midpoint for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSPANW
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%20.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%5.63%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%6.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%13.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%11.09%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%73.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PANW

0.90

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

PANW’s Current Ratio of 0.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PANW

0.11

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

PANW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PANW

378.50

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 378.50, PANW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSPANW
Current Ratio (TTM)10.620.90
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.620.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.020.11
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.04
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.82-0.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.83378.50

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and PANW. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PANW

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PANW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PANW

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PANW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSPANW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

PANW

108.44

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

At 108.44, PANW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

PANW

-1.08

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

PANW has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -1.08. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PANW

15.16

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

PANW’s P/S Ratio of 15.16 is in the upper echelon for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PANW

18.56

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

ASTS vs. PANW: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSPANW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.32108.44
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.35-1.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.2815.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.3218.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.6655.15
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.8080.07
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.6014.99