Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASTS’s market capitalization stands at 15.96 billion USD, while NTAP’s is 21.49 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 2.02 for ASTS and 1.41 for NTAP, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolASTSNTAP
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.NetApp, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentComputer Hardware
CEOAbel AvellanGeorge Kurian
Price45.6 USD107.26 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD21.49 billion USD
Beta2.021.41
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019November 21, 1995
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NTAP

123.03%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

NTAP

16.49%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

NTAP’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.49% is in line with the norm for the Computer Hardware industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NTAP

18.05%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.05% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NTAP

20.34%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSNTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%123.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%10.96%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%16.49%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%18.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%20.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%70.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

NTAP

1.26

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NTAP

3.36

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.36, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Computer Hardware industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NTAP

31.09

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.09 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSNTAP
Current Ratio (TTM)10.621.26
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.621.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.023.36
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.32
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.820.47
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.8331.09

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and NTAP. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP

1.94%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.94%, NTAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP

35.75%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSNTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.94%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

NTAP

18.36

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.36 is within the middle range for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

NTAP

2.15

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTAP

3.27

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NTAP

20.94

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

NTAP’s P/B Ratio of 20.94 is in the upper tier for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ASTS vs. NTAP: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSNTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.3218.36
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.352.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.283.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.3220.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.6616.06
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.8013.94
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.603.38