ASTS vs. NET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and NET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
NET towers over ASTS with a market cap of 54.25 billion USD, roughly 6.95 times the 7.81 billion USD of its peer.
ASTS at 2.04 and NET at 1.78 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Symbol | ASTS | NET |
---|---|---|
Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Cloudflare, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Infrastructure |
CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. Matthew Prince J.D. |
Price | 23.83 USD | 156.52 USD |
Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 54.25 billion USD |
Beta | 2.044 | 1.785 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | September 13, 2019 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and NET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and NET based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Both ASTS at -16.37 and NET at -662.24 have negative P/E values over the past twelve months. This reflects consistent losses rather than profits, meaning their current operations aren’t generating positive net income—a situation that could challenge their financial stability if prolonged.
- ASTS shows a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -21.60, meaning it’s been burning through cash faster than it can produce it over the past twelve months—a troubling sign for its financial resilience. On the flip side, NET at 294.56 has managed to keep its cash flow in positive territory.
Symbol | ASTS | NET |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | -662.24 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | 6.62 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 30.65 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 37.95 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | 294.56 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | 627.17 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 31.37 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | 301.47 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTS nor NET pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
Symbol | ASTS | NET |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and NET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- NET’s -27.68 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, ASTS at 39.54 has room to breathe.
Symbol | ASTS | NET |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 3.20 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 3.20 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 1.04 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.40 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -27.68 |