ASTS vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

MU’s market capitalization of 114.04 billion USD is significantly greater than ASTS’s 8.10 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ASTS’s beta of 2.02 points to significantly higher volatility compared to MU (beta: 1.28), suggesting ASTS has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and MU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

This section compares the market valuation of ASTS and MU. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.

• ASTS’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -16.95 is negative, highlighting a lack of current profitability. This situation is a concern for its immediate financial performance and can impact investor confidence.
• ASTS’s Forward PEG ratio of 8.30 is very high. This suggests that investors have priced in a substantial amount of future earnings growth, potentially making the stock vulnerable if these high expectations are not met or if growth slows.
• ASTS’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 7.21 is very high. This often indicates that the market values the company significantly above its net asset value, usually reflecting strong profitability, valuable intangible assets (like brand or patents), or high expectations for future growth.

Dividend Comparison

ASTS currently offers no dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MU provides a 0.45% dividend yield, offering investors a component of income return.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section evaluates the financial strength of ASTS and MU. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.

• ASTS’s Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR) of -52.83 is negative. This implies its operating earnings are insufficient to meet its interest expenses, a serious situation that threatens its financial stability and capacity to honor debt commitments.