Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. MSTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and MSTR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MSTR’s market capitalization of 110.45 billion USD is significantly greater than ASTS’s 15.96 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

MSTR carries a higher beta at 3.76, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ASTS (beta: 2.02) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolASTSMSTR
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.MicroStrategy Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentSoftware - Application
CEOAbel AvellanPhong Q. Le
Price45.6 USD403.99 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD110.45 billion USD
Beta2.023.76
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019June 11, 1998
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and MSTR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. MSTR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MSTR

-81.73%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

MSTR has a negative Return on Equity of -81.73%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

MSTR

-12.06%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

MSTR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -12.06%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MSTR

-1,163.04%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

MSTR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1,163.04%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MSTR

-1,648.40%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

MSTR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1,648.40%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSMSTR
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%-81.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%-12.16%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%-12.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%-1163.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%-1648.40%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%70.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MSTR

0.66

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

MSTR’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MSTR

0.08

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

MSTR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MSTR

-229.74

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

MSTR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -229.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSMSTR
Current Ratio (TTM)10.620.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.620.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.020.08
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.00
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.82-0.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.83-229.74

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and MSTR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MSTR

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSTR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MSTR

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSTR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSMSTR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

MSTR

-19.40

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

MSTR has a negative P/E Ratio of -19.40. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

MSTR

0.07

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, MSTR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.07 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MSTR

240.49

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

With a P/S Ratio of 240.49, MSTR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software - Application industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MSTR

79.43

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

ASTS vs. MSTR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSMSTR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.32-19.40
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.350.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.28240.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.3279.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.66-5.38
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.80-14.59
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.60240.60