Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. MSI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and MSI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MSI’s market capitalization of 70.91 billion USD is significantly greater than ASTS’s 15.96 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ASTS’s beta of 2.02 points to significantly higher volatility compared to MSI (beta: 0.97), suggesting ASTS has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolASTSMSI
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.Motorola Solutions, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentCommunication Equipment
CEOAbel AvellanGregory Q. Brown
Price45.6 USD424.84 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD70.91 billion USD
Beta2.020.97
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019March 17, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and MSI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. MSI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MSI

149.56%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

MSI’s Return on Equity of 149.56% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their ROE against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

MSI

22.82%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

MSI’s Return on Invested Capital of 22.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their ROIC against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MSI

18.67%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.67% places MSI in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MSI

25.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.20% places MSI in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSMSI
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%149.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%14.18%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%22.82%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%18.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%25.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%50.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MSI

1.20

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

MSI’s Current Ratio of 1.20 falls into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MSI

3.98

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.98, MSI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Communication Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MSI

11.80

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

MSI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.80 is in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSMSI
Current Ratio (TTM)10.621.20
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.621.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.023.98
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.45
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.821.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.8311.80

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and MSI. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MSI

1.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.00%, MSI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communication Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MSI

32.89%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.89% is in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSMSI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%32.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

MSI

34.66

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

MSI’s P/E Ratio of 34.66 is within the middle range for the Communication Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

MSI

4.11

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MSI

6.47

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 6.47, MSI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MSI

43.21

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

At 43.21, MSI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communication Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ASTS vs. MSI: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Communication Equipment industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSMSI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.3234.66
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.354.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.286.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.3243.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.6631.23
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.8024.03
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.606.92