Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. KSPI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and KSPI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASTS’s market capitalization stands at 15.96 billion USD, while KSPI’s is 16.08 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

ASTS has a positive beta (2.02), indicating it generally moves with the broader market, whereas KSPI has a negative beta (-0.05), often moving inversely, which can offer diversification or hedging benefits.

KSPI is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. ASTS, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolASTSKSPI
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz
CountryUSKZ
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOAbel AvellanMikheil N. Lomtadze
Price45.6 USD84.64 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD16.08 billion USD
Beta2.02-0.05
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019July 23, 2018
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and KSPI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. KSPI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KSPI

74.52%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

In the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, KSPI’s Return on Equity of 74.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

KSPI

43.01%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

KSPI’s Return on Invested Capital of 43.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KSPI

38.56%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

A Net Profit Margin of 38.56% places KSPI in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KSPI

52.62%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

KSPI’s Operating Profit Margin of 52.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSKSPI
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%74.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%11.56%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%43.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%38.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%52.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%64.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

KSPI

1.07

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

KSPI’s Current Ratio of 1.07 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KSPI

0.36

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

KSPI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KSPI

9.97

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

KSPI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.97 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSKSPI
Current Ratio (TTM)10.621.07
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.621.05
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.020.36
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.07
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.82-0.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.839.97

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and KSPI. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KSPI

4.14%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KSPI’s Dividend Yield of 4.14% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KSPI

30.07%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KSPI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.07% is in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSKSPI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%30.07%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

KSPI

7.77

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

In the lower quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, KSPI’s P/E Ratio of 7.77 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

KSPI

-0.08

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

KSPI has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.08. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KSPI

3.00

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

KSPI’s P/S Ratio of 3.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KSPI

4.88

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

ASTS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSKSPI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.327.77
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.35-0.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.283.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.324.88
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.6617.17
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.805.67
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.602.97