Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolASTSJBL
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryDiversified Telecommunication ServicesElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization17.30 billion USD22.31 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 1, 2019May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASTSJBL
5-Day Price Return7.27%1.39%
13-Week Price Return94.24%22.89%
26-Week Price Return68.47%27.85%
52-Week Price Return42.84%91.26%
Month-to-Date Return-9.25%-6.84%
Year-to-Date Return128.67%44.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.71M1.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.10M1.36M
3-Month Volatility76.50%32.85%
Beta2.491.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ASTS

-63.47%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
35.96%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.29%
Q1
-0.99%
Min
-18.19%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -63.47%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ASTS

-7,213.88%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
28.40%
Q3
13.05%
Median
6.85%
Q1
-0.81%
Min
-18.76%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,213.88%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ASTS

-5,539.51%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
37.46%
Q3
22.24%
Median
15.73%
Q1
9.79%
Min
2.06%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,539.51%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)-63.47%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)-28.08%3.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7,213.88%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5,539.51%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)49.35%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ASTS

8.23

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.63
Q3
1.14
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.16

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 8.23 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ASTS

0.57

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.06
Median
1.32
Q1
0.74
Min
0.11

Falling into the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.57 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ASTS

-115.23

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
14.66
Q3
8.25
Median
3.53
Q1
1.47
Min
-2.60

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -115.23. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)8.230.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)8.140.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.572.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-115.2311.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ASTS vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ASTS

0.00%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
10.34%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.89%
Q1
1.73%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ASTS

0.00%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
270.06%
Q3
135.21%
Median
76.62%
Q1
35.06%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ASTS

--

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
33.39
Q3
23.91
Median
16.72
Q1
13.00
Min
4.13

P/E Ratio data for ASTS is currently unavailable.

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ASTS

3,302.29

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.60
Median
1.62
Q1
0.94
Min
0.35

With a P/S Ratio of 3,302.29, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ASTS

18.09

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
3.45
Median
2.10
Q1
1.19
Min
0.32

At 18.09, ASTS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ASTS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--37.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3,302.290.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.0914.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--18.82