ASTS vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and IONQ, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With ASTS at 7.81 billion USD and IONQ at 8.31 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 2.04 for ASTS and 2.46 for IONQ, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ASTS | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | IonQ, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. Niccolo Mcleod de Masi |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 33.54 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 8.31 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 2.46 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | January 4, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and IONQ over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and IONQ based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither ASTS nor IONQ turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -16.37 and -23.66, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- ASTS and IONQ both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -21.60 and -42.42, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | ASTS | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | -23.66 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | 8.08 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 193.01 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 10.03 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | -42.42 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | -34.91 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 189.71 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | -41.70 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTS nor IONQ currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ASTS | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and IONQ, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASTS (at 39.54) covers its interest payments, while IONQ shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | ASTS | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 13.17 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 12.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -- |