ASTS vs. INTC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and INTC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
INTC towers over ASTS with a market cap of 90.25 billion USD, roughly 11.55 times the 7.81 billion USD of its peer.
ASTS rides a wilder wave with a beta of 2.04, hinting at bigger swings than INTC’s steadier 1.14.
| Symbol | ASTS | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Intel Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. Lip-Bu Tan |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 20.69 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 90.25 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.044 | 1.144 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and INTC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and INTC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Both ASTS at -16.37 and INTC at -4.68 have negative P/E values over the past twelve months. This reflects consistent losses rather than profits, meaning their current operations aren’t generating positive net income—a situation that could challenge their financial stability if prolonged.
- INTC has a negative Forward PEG of -0.05, suggesting analysts predict either a drop in earnings or no profits at all in the near future—a red flag for its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, ASTS at 8.02 avoids such a pessimistic forecast.
- Both ASTS at -21.60 and INTC at -7.03 have negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow values. This reveals they’ve been consuming more cash than they generate over the past year—a persistent cash drain that could strain their ability to operate without external funding.
| Symbol | ASTS | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | -4.68 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | -0.05 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 1.70 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 0.90 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | -7.03 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | 87.64 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 2.48 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | -10.24 |
Dividend Comparison
ASTS pays no dividends, focusing all profits on growth, appealing to capital-gains investors. Meanwhile, INTC’s 0.60% yield rewards shareholders, showing financial confidence while supporting objectives—a contrast to ASTS’s growth-only approach.
| Symbol | ASTS | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.60% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and INTC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- INTC’s -9.98 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, ASTS at 39.54 has room to breathe.
| Symbol | ASTS | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 1.31 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 0.93 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.50 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.26 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -9.98 |