Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

IBM’s market capitalization of 271.36 billion USD is significantly greater than ASTS’s 15.96 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ASTS’s beta of 2.02 points to significantly higher volatility compared to IBM (beta: 0.65), suggesting ASTS has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolASTSIBM
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentInformation Technology Services
CEOAbel AvellanArvind Krishna
Price45.6 USD291.97 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD271.36 billion USD
Beta2.020.65
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019September 24, 1915
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IBM

21.32%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.32% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

IBM

8.48%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

IBM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.48% is in line with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IBM

8.71%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IBM

16.36%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.36% places IBM in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%21.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%3.76%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%8.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%8.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%16.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%57.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IBM

1.01

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

IBM’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IBM

2.49

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Information Technology Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.49. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IBM

5.92

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSIBM
Current Ratio (TTM)10.621.01
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.620.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.022.49
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.46
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.824.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.835.92

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and IBM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM

2.29%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.29%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM

112.81%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 112.81% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%112.81%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

IBM

49.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

At 49.51, IBM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

IBM

9.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

IBM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 9.51 is exceptionally high for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IBM

4.32

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.32 is in the upper echelon for the Information Technology Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IBM

10.08

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

ASTS vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.3249.51
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.359.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.284.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.3210.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.6622.73
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.8026.54
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.605.21