ASTS vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and IBM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
IBM stands out with 242.45 billion USD in market value—about 31.04× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.
ASTS’s beta of 2.04 points to much larger expected swings compared to IBM’s calmer 0.63, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ASTS | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | International Business Machines Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Information Technology Services |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. Arvind Krishna |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 260.87 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 242.45 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 0.63 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | September 24, 1915 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and IBM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and IBM based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ASTS posts a negative P/E of -16.37, reflecting last year’s net loss, while IBM at 44.23 signals healthy earnings.
- ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, IBM (P/FCF 20.31) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ASTS | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | 44.23 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | 8.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 3.86 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 9.01 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | 20.31 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | 24.19 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 4.75 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | 24.98 |
Dividend Comparison
ASTS offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while IBM provides a 2.56% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ASTS | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.56% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
Explore the financial strength details for ASTS and IBM in the table below.
| Symbol | ASTS | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 1.01 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 0.97 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 2.49 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.46 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | 5.92 |