Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. HPQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and HPQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

HPQ’s market capitalization of 24.42 billion USD is significantly greater than ASTS’s 15.96 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ASTS’s beta of 2.02 points to significantly higher volatility compared to HPQ (beta: 1.31), suggesting ASTS has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolASTSHPQ
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.HP Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentComputer Hardware
CEOAbel AvellanEnrique J. Lores
Price45.6 USD26 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD24.42 billion USD
Beta2.021.31
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019November 6, 1957
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and HPQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. HPQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HPQ

-1,205.75%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

HPQ has a negative Return on Equity of -1,205.75%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

HPQ

21.75%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, HPQ’s Return on Invested Capital of 21.75% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HPQ

4.64%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

HPQ’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HPQ

6.32%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

HPQ’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.32% is around the midpoint for the Computer Hardware industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSHPQ
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%-1205.75%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%6.49%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%21.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%4.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%6.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%21.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

HPQ

0.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

HPQ’s Current Ratio of 0.73 falls into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HPQ

3.64

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.64, HPQ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Computer Hardware industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HPQ

8.60

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

HPQ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Computer Hardware industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSHPQ
Current Ratio (TTM)10.620.73
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.620.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.023.64
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.28
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.821.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.838.60

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and HPQ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HPQ

4.40%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.40%, HPQ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HPQ

42.79%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPQ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.79% is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSHPQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%42.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

HPQ

9.81

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

HPQ’s P/E Ratio of 9.81 is below the typical range for the Computer Hardware industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

HPQ

1.32

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HPQ

0.45

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

In the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, HPQ’s P/S Ratio of 0.45 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HPQ

8.37

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

HPQ’s P/B Ratio of 8.37 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASTS vs. HPQ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSHPQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.329.81
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.351.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.280.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.328.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.669.18
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.807.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.600.60