Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. GTM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and GTM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASTS’s market capitalization stands at 15.96 billion USD, while GTM’s is 11.52 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

ASTS’s beta of 2.02 points to significantly higher volatility compared to GTM (beta: 1.06), suggesting ASTS has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolASTSGTM
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentSoftware - Application
CEOAbel AvellanHenry L. Schuck
Price45.6 USD10.26 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD11.52 billion USD
Beta2.021.06
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019June 4, 2020
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and GTM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. GTM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GTM

2.38%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

GTM’s Return on Equity of 2.38% is on par with the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

GTM

1.78%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

GTM’s Return on Invested Capital of 1.78% is in line with the norm for the Software - Application industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GTM

3.37%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

GTM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software - Application industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GTM

8.65%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

GTM’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.65% is around the midpoint for the Software - Application industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSGTM
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%2.38%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%0.64%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%1.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%3.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%8.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%83.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GTM

0.66

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

GTM’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GTM

0.11

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

GTM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GTM

2.68

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

GTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSGTM
Current Ratio (TTM)10.620.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.620.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.020.11
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.03
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.820.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.832.68

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and GTM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GTM

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GTM

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSGTM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

GTM

86.01

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

GTM’s P/E Ratio of 86.01 is within the middle range for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

GTM

-4.07

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

GTM has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -4.07. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GTM

9.53

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

GTM’s P/S Ratio of 9.53 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GTM

2.13

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

ASTS vs. GTM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSGTM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.3286.01
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.35-4.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.289.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.322.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.6636.46
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.8078.63
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.609.56