Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASTS’s market capitalization stands at 15.96 billion USD, while FTV’s is 18.03 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

ASTS’s beta of 2.02 points to significantly higher volatility compared to FTV (beta: 1.16), suggesting ASTS has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolASTSFTV
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.Fortive Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOAbel AvellanJames A. Lico
Price45.6 USD53.05 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD18.03 billion USD
Beta2.021.16
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019July 5, 2016
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FTV

7.69%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.69% is on par with the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

FTV

6.31%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

FTV’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.31% is in line with the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FTV

12.90%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.90% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FTV

18.41%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.41% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%7.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%4.65%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%6.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%12.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%18.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%59.98%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FTV

0.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FTV

0.38

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FTV

10.46

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSFTV
Current Ratio (TTM)10.620.99
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.620.78
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.020.38
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.23
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.821.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.8310.46

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and FTV. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV

0.60%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.60% is consistent with its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV

13.83%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.83% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.60%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%13.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

FTV

22.69

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

In the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, FTV’s P/E Ratio of 22.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

FTV

2.59

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FTV

2.92

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FTV

1.77

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 1.77 is in the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ASTS vs. FTV: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.3222.69
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.352.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.282.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.321.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.6612.96
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.8013.82
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.603.40