ASTS vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

FTV stands out with 23.83 billion USD in market value—about 3.05× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.

ASTS’s beta of 2.04 points to much larger expected swings compared to FTV’s calmer 1.16, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and FTV over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and FTV based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• ASTS posts a negative P/E of -16.37, reflecting last year’s net loss, while FTV at 29.99 signals healthy earnings.
• ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, FTV (P/FCF 17.13) indicates positive free cash flow generation.

Dividend Comparison

ASTS offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while FTV provides a 0.46% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and FTV, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• FTV’s current ratio of 0.99 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ASTS at 10.62 maintains healthy liquidity.
• FTV posts a quick ratio of 0.78, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ASTS at 10.62 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.