ASTS vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and FIS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
FIS stands out with 41.60 billion USD in market value—about 5.32× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.
ASTS’s beta of 2.04 points to much larger expected swings compared to FIS’s calmer 1.10, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ASTS | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Consumer Electronics |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Ms. Stephanie L. Ferris |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 79.17 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 41.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 1.10 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | June 20, 2001 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and FIS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and FIS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ASTS posts a negative P/E of -16.37, reflecting last year’s net loss, while FIS at 50.67 signals healthy earnings.
- ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, FIS (P/FCF 26.36) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ASTS | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | 50.67 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | 7.02 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 4.08 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 2.77 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | 26.36 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | 15.35 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 5.19 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | 33.51 |
Dividend Comparison
ASTS offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while FIS provides a 1.87% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ASTS | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.87% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and FIS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FIS’s current ratio of 0.63 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ASTS at 10.62 maintains healthy liquidity.
- FIS posts a quick ratio of 0.63, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ASTS at 10.62 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | ASTS | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 0.63 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 0.63 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.80 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.37 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | 6.73 |