Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. CLSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and CLSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASTS’s market capitalization of 15.96 billion USD is substantially larger than CLSK’s 3.44 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

CLSK carries a higher beta at 4.24, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ASTS (beta: 2.02) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolASTSCLSK
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.CleanSpark, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentSoftware - Application
CEOAbel AvellanZachary K. Bradford CPA
Price45.6 USD12.25 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD3.44 billion USD
Beta2.024.24
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019November 16, 2016
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and CLSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. CLSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CLSK

-10.77%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

CLSK has a negative Return on Equity of -10.77%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

CLSK

-9.34%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

CLSK has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -9.34%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CLSK

-35.43%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

CLSK has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.43%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CLSK

-45.17%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

CLSK has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -45.17%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSCLSK
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%-10.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%-7.17%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%-9.34%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%-35.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%-45.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%43.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CLSK

8.67

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

CLSK’s Current Ratio of 8.67 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CLSK

0.00

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, CLSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CLSK

-57.67

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

CLSK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -57.67. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSCLSK
Current Ratio (TTM)10.628.67
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.628.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.020.00
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.00
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.82-1.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.83-57.67

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and CLSK. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLSK

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLSK

-1.49%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -1.49%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSCLSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%-1.49%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

CLSK

-18.07

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

CLSK has a negative P/E Ratio of -18.07. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

CLSK

-0.12

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

CLSK has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.12. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CLSK

6.40

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

CLSK’s P/S Ratio of 6.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CLSK

1.82

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

ASTS vs. CLSK: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSCLSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.32-18.07
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.35-0.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.286.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.321.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.66-2.78
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.8069.77
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.606.23