Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. CLS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and CLS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASTS’s market capitalization stands at 15.96 billion USD, while CLS’s is 18.31 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 2.02 for ASTS and 1.64 for CLS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolASTSCLS
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.Celestica Inc.
CountryUSCA
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOAbel AvellanRobert Andrew Mionis
Price45.6 USD159.26 USD
Market Cap15.96 billion USD18.31 billion USD
Beta2.021.64
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateNovember 1, 2019June 30, 1998
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and CLS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. CLS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASTS

-76.72%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -76.72%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CLS

23.32%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, CLS’s Return on Equity of 23.32% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASTS

-19.41%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

ASTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -19.41%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

CLS

16.79%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, CLS’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.79% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASTS

-7,033.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,033.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CLS

4.09%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 4.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASTS

-5,397.45%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,397.45%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CLS

6.01%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.01% is around the midpoint for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSCLS
Return on Equity (TTM)-76.72%23.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.81%7.07%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-19.41%16.79%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7033.20%4.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5397.45%6.01%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-486.80%10.59%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASTS

10.62

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 10.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CLS

1.43

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.43 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASTS

0.02

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CLS

0.60

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

CLS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASTS

-52.83

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -52.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CLS

12.39

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.39 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSCLS
Current Ratio (TTM)10.621.43
Quick Ratio (TTM)10.620.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.020.60
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.010.16
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.820.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-52.8312.39

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASTS and CLS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLS

0.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASTS

0.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLS

0.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSCLS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASTS

-31.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

ASTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.32. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

CLS

44.75

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

CLS’s P/E Ratio of 44.75 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASTS

15.35

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

CLS

2.18

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASTS

5,043.28

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 5,043.28, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CLS

1.82

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASTS

13.32

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

ASTS’s P/B Ratio of 13.32 is in the upper tier for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CLS

11.86

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.86, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ASTS vs. CLS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Communication Equipment and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSCLS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-31.3244.75
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)15.352.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5043.281.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)13.3211.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-64.6651.94
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-47.8026.15
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4858.601.88