Seek Returns logo

ASND vs. ISRG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ASND and ISRG, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

ISRG stands out with 196.08 billion USD in market value—about 20.54× ASND’s market cap of 9.55 billion USD.

ISRG carries a higher beta at 1.70, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ASND remains steadier at 0.40.

ASND trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while ISRG remains a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASNDISRG
Company NameAscendis Pharma A/SIntuitive Surgical, Inc.
CountryDKUS
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Instruments & Supplies
CEOMr. Jan Moller MikkelsenDr. Gary S. Guthart Ph.D.
Price158.1 USD547.07 USD
Market Cap9.55 billion USD196.08 billion USD
Beta0.401.70
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJanuary 28, 2015June 16, 2000
ADRYesNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ASND and ISRG over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASND and ISRG based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

  • ASND posts a negative P/E of -24.55, reflecting last year’s net loss, while ISRG at 78.99 signals healthy earnings.
  • ASND posts a negative forward PEG of -2.23, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas ISRG at 5.02 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
  • ASND has a negative P/B ratio of -44.20, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). ISRG, with a P/B of 11.43, maintains positive shareholder equity.
  • ASND has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -27.43, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, ISRG (P/FCF 112.35) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
SymbolASNDISRG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-24.5578.99
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-2.235.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)22.8922.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)-44.2011.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-27.43112.35
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-35.7464.49
EV-to-Sales (TTM)23.7822.20
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)-28.50110.87

Dividend Comparison

Neither ASND nor ISRG currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

SymbolASNDISRG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ASND and ISRG, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • ASND’s quick ratio of 0.71 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ISRG at 3.97 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
  • ASND has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -4.46), an unusual warning sign, while ISRG at 0.00 maintains a conventional debt-to-equity balance.
  • ASND has negative EBIT (interest coverage -3.72), unable to cover interest, while ISRG shows “--” (negligible interest expense).
SymbolASNDISRG
Current Ratio (TTM)1.044.98
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.713.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)-4.460.00
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.800.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.72--