ASND vs. GILD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

GILD stands out with 134.00 billion USD in market value—about 14.04× ASND’s market cap of 9.55 billion USD.

With betas of 0.40 for ASND and 0.28 for GILD, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

ASND trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while GILD remains a standard domestic listing.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ASND and GILD over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASND and GILD based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• ASND posts a negative P/E of -24.55, reflecting last year’s net loss, while GILD at 22.50 signals healthy earnings.
• ASND posts a negative forward PEG of -2.23, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas GILD at 3.17 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
• ASND has a negative P/B ratio of -44.19, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). GILD, with a P/B of 7.00, maintains positive shareholder equity.
• ASND has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -27.43, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, GILD (P/FCF 13.61) indicates positive free cash flow generation.

Dividend Comparison

ASND offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while GILD provides a 2.88% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ASND and GILD, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• ASND’s quick ratio of 0.71 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas GILD at 1.23 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
• ASND has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -4.46), an unusual warning sign, while GILD at 1.30 maintains a conventional debt-to-equity balance.
• With negative EBIT (-3.72), ASND cannot cover its interest payments. GILD, with an interest coverage of 8.35, meets its interest obligations.