Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. WIT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and WIT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization of 312.40 billion USD is substantially larger than WIT’s 32.56 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ASML’s beta of 1.22 points to significantly higher volatility compared to WIT (beta: 0.74), suggesting ASML has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

ASML and WIT are both American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies without directly engaging with overseas stock exchanges.

SymbolASMLWIT
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Wipro Limited
CountryNLIN
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsInformation Technology Services
CEOChristophe D. FouquetSrinivas Pallia
Price794.5 USD3.11 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD32.56 billion USD
Beta1.220.74
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995October 19, 2000
ADRYesYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and WIT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. WIT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WIT

16.15%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

WIT’s Return on Equity of 16.15% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

WIT

10.33%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

WIT’s Return on Invested Capital of 10.33% is in line with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WIT

14.74%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.74% places WIT in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WIT

16.98%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.98% places WIT in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLWIT
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%16.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%10.21%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%10.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%14.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%16.98%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%30.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

WIT

2.71

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

WIT’s Current Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WIT

0.24

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

WIT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 is typical for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

WIT

10.24

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

WIT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.24 is in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLWIT
Current Ratio (TTM)1.522.71
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.912.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.210.24
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.15
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.470.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--10.24

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and WIT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WIT

192.62%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WIT’s Dividend Yield of 192.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WIT

47.77%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WIT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 47.77% is in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLWIT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%192.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%47.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WIT

21.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

WIT’s P/E Ratio of 21.51 is within the middle range for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

WIT

1.97

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

WIT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.97 is within the middle range of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WIT

3.17

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

WIT’s P/S Ratio of 3.17 aligns with the market consensus for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WIT

3.53

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

ASML vs. WIT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLWIT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.7221.51
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.901.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.443.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.783.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.9317.20
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.0914.21
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.273.25