ASML vs. TTD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and TTD, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs TTD in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 7.92 times the 36.60 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and TTD at 1.29 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while TTD sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | TTD |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | The Trade Desk, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Jeffrey Terry Green |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 74.47 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 36.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.288 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | September 21, 2016 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and TTD over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and TTD, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | TTD |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | 89.44 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 3.54 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 14.24 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 13.57 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 52.84 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | 71.92 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 13.94 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 51.71 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike TTD, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against TTD’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | ASML | TTD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and TTD, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- For ASML and TTD, interest coverage shows as “--”, pointing to negligible interest costs—often a sign of slim debt or rock-bottom rates keeping expenses near zero.
| Symbol | ASML | TTD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.81 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.81 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.12 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |