ASML vs. STX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

ASML dwarfs STX in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 13.08 times the 22.16 billion USD of its counterpart.

ASML at 1.22 and STX at 1.34 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.

Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while STX sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ASML and STX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and STX based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• STX has a negative Forward PEG of -6.15, suggesting analysts predict either a drop in earnings or no profits at all in the near future—a red flag for its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, ASML at 1.80 avoids such a pessimistic forecast.
• STX posts a negative Price-to-Book of -26.71, where its liabilities exceed its assets—a stark warning of underlying financial weakness that could threaten its long-term viability. Meanwhile, ASML at 14.58 stands on firmer ground with a positive book value.

Dividend Comparison

Both ASML at 0.98% and STX at 2.72% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet STX’s 2.72% yield, 176% above ASML’s 0.98%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while ASML leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and STX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• At 0.75, STX’s quick ratio falls below 0.8, where liquid assets, minus inventory, can’t keep up with short-term bills—possibly riding on cash flow. By contrast, ASML hits 0.91, covering its bases comfortably.
• ASML’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while STX at -9.96 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.