ASML vs. RGTI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and RGTI, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dominates in value with a market cap of 289.86 billion USD, eclipsing RGTI’s 3.18 billion USD by roughly 91.09×.
With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.42 for RGTI, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
ASML trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while RGTI remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | RGTI |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Rigetti Computing, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Dr. Subodh K. Kulkarni Ph.D. |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 10.96 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 3.18 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.42 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | April 22, 2021 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and RGTI over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and RGTI based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- RGTI shows a negative P/E of -22.68, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ASML at 29.38 trades on solid profitability.
- RGTI reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -53.67, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ASML at 27.60 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ASML | RGTI |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.38 | -22.68 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 2.69 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.34 | 345.49 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.61 | 15.06 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.60 | -53.67 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.82 | -16.21 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.17 | 342.37 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.02 | -53.18 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML delivers a 0.98% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas RGTI appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ASML | RGTI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and RGTI, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but RGTI is in the red with interest coverage -34.24, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ASML | RGTI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 18.82 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 18.82 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.03 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -34.24 |