ASML vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and RBLX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
ASML’s market capitalization of 302.84 billion USD is substantially larger than RBLX’s 63.37 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.
With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.56 for RBLX, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.
ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RBLX is a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Roblox Corporation |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. David Baszucki |
| Price | 770.2 USD | 93.42 USD |
| Market Cap | 302.84 billion USD | 63.37 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.56 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | March 10, 2021 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and RBLX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of ASML and RBLX. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- RBLX’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -71.32 is negative. This indicates the company is currently not generating profit, a key factor that can weigh on its stock valuation and investor sentiment.
| Symbol | ASML | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 30.71 | -71.32 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.74 | 1.55 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.72 | 16.52 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 15.27 | 201.96 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.83 | -104.16 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.55 | 16.69 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML provides a 0.94% dividend yield, potentially offering a blend of income and growth, whereas RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, possibly retaining profits to fund operations or growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ASML | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.94% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section evaluates the financial strength of ASML and RBLX. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.
- RBLX’s Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio of 5.81 is very high. This signals a considerable debt load relative to equity, potentially heightening its risk during economic downturns or if interest rates rise, and may affect its financial resilience.
| Symbol | ASML | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.02 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 5.81 |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | -0.47 | -1.05 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -25.09 |