ASML vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

ASML dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 65.37 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.

ASML at 1.22 and QBTS at 0.89 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.

Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while QBTS sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ASML and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• QBTS shows a negative P/E of -33.33, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ASML at 29.41 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
• QBTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -84.98, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, ASML at 27.63 maintains a positive cash position.

Dividend Comparison

ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike QBTS, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against QBTS’s long-term focus.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• ASML’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while QBTS at -28.05 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.