ASML vs. PANW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and PANW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs PANW in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 2.42 times the 120.01 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and PANW at 1.02 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while PANW sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Nikesh Arora C.F.A. |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 181.26 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 120.01 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.024 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | July 20, 2012 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and PANW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and PANW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- PANW has a negative Forward PEG of -0.95, suggesting analysts predict either a drop in earnings or no profits at all in the near future—a red flag for its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, ASML at 1.80 avoids such a pessimistic forecast.
| Symbol | ASML | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | 95.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | -0.95 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 14.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 18.74 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 40.33 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | 78.26 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 13.85 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 39.88 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike PANW, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against PANW’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | ASML | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and PANW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- PANW’s current ratio of 0.84 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, ASML at 1.52 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while PANW at 591.06 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 0.84 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.14 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.04 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 591.06 |