Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. MS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and MS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization stands at 312.40 billion USD, while MS’s is 231.25 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.29 for MS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MS is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLMS
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Morgan Stanley
CountryNLUS
SectorTechnologyFinancial Services
IndustrySemiconductorsFinancial - Capital Markets
CEOChristophe D. FouquetEdward N. Pick
Price794.5 USD144.14 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD231.25 billion USD
Beta1.221.29
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995February 23, 1993
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and MS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. MS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MS

14.01%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.02%
Q3
20.69%
Median
13.73%
Q1
3.33%
Min
-21.32%

MS’s Return on Equity of 14.01% is on par with the norm for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

MS

2.64%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
30.24%
Q3
13.34%
Median
6.20%
Q1
-1.71%
Min
-16.91%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MS

13.52%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
28.67%
Q3
13.52%
Median
10.47%
Q1
0.24%
Min
-9.55%

MS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MS

17.73%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
56.86%
Q3
25.29%
Median
15.90%
Q1
0.51%
Min
-19.18%

MS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.73% is around the midpoint for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLMS
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%14.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%1.18%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%2.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%13.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%17.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%56.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MS

0.66

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
3.24
Median
1.32
Q1
0.96
Min
0.05

For the Financial - Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MS

3.45

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.68
Median
0.37
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

MS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Financial - Capital Markets industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.45. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

MS

0.41

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
12.71
Q3
7.94
Median
1.92
Q1
0.24
Min
-7.71

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLMS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.520.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.910.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.213.45
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.30
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.4711.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--0.41

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and MS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MS

2.57%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
5.86%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.57%, MS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MS

42.94%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
128.06%
Q3
43.11%
Median
12.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.94% is within the typical range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%2.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%42.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MS

15.97

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.65
Q3
29.09
Median
20.52
Q1
14.58
Min
8.28

MS’s P/E Ratio of 15.97 is within the middle range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

MS

2.27

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.05
Q3
2.46
Median
1.52
Q1
0.78
Min
0.02

MS’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.27 is within the middle range of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MS

2.19

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.34
Q3
7.63
Median
2.98
Q1
1.50
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MS

2.18

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
6.00
Median
2.91
Q1
1.84
Min
0.53

MS’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is within the conventional range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASML vs. MS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.7215.97
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.902.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.442.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.782.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.93-110.12
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.0921.68
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.274.88