ASML vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and MRVL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dominates in value with a market cap of 289.86 billion USD, eclipsing MRVL’s 51.92 billion USD by roughly 5.58×.
MRVL carries a higher beta at 1.82, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ASML remains steadier at 1.22.
ASML trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while MRVL remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Marvell Technology, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Matthew J. Murphy |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 60.11 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 51.92 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.82 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | June 30, 2000 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and MRVL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and MRVL based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- MRVL shows a negative P/E of -58.80, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ASML at 29.38 trades on solid profitability.
- MRVL shows a negative forward PEG of -2.32, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ASML at 1.80 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | ASML | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.38 | -58.80 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | -2.32 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.35 | 9.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.61 | 3.88 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.61 | 37.35 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.83 | -2221.67 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.17 | 9.59 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.02 | 39.79 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s dividend yield of 0.98% is about 146% higher than MRVL’s 0.40%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | ASML | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.40% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and MRVL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but MRVL is in the red with interest coverage -3.75, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ASML | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.03 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.32 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -3.75 |