ASML vs. MDB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and MDB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs MDB in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 19.17 times the 15.12 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and MDB at 1.49 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while MDB sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | MongoDB, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Dev C. Ittycheria |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 185.01 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 15.12 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.492 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | October 19, 2017 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and MDB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and MDB based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- MDB shows a negative P/E of -111.28, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ASML at 29.33 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- MDB has a negative Forward PEG of -7.16, suggesting analysts predict either a drop in earnings or no profits at all in the near future—a red flag for its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, ASML at 1.80 avoids such a pessimistic forecast.
| Symbol | ASML | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | -111.28 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | -7.16 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 7.53 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 5.16 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 125.31 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | -151.91 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 7.31 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 121.55 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike MDB, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against MDB’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | ASML | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and MDB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while MDB at -26.70 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.
| Symbol | ASML | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 5.20 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 5.20 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.01 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -26.70 |