ASML vs. MCHP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and MCHP, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs MCHP in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 9.10 times the 31.87 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and MCHP at 1.41 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while MCHP sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Microchip Technology Incorporated |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Stephen Sanghi |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 59.25 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 31.87 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.407 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | March 19, 1993 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and MCHP over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and MCHP based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- MCHP shows a negative P/E of -11792.94, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ASML at 29.41 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- MCHP has a negative Forward PEG of -221.72, suggesting analysts predict either a drop in earnings or no profits at all in the near future—a red flag for its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, ASML at 1.80 avoids such a pessimistic forecast.
| Symbol | ASML | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.41 | -11792.94 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | -221.72 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.35 | 7.24 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.62 | 5.28 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.63 | 34.11 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.85 | 44.38 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.18 | 8.65 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.05 | 40.74 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ASML at 0.98% and MCHP at 2.30% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet MCHP’s 2.30% yield, 135% above ASML’s 0.98%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while ASML leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | ASML | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 2.30% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and MCHP, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while MCHP at 1.59 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 2.25 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.23 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 1.12 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.43 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 1.59 |