Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ASML trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with access to a foreign company, while LIN is a standard domestic stock.

SymbolASMLLIN
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Linde plc
CountryNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyMaterials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentChemicals
Market Capitalization296.82 billion USD225.86 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 15, 1995June 17, 1992
Security TypeNY Reg ShrsCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASMLLIN
5-Day Price Return1.17%0.66%
13-Week Price Return-1.19%5.75%
26-Week Price Return-9.94%3.40%
52-Week Price Return-19.16%4.31%
Month-to-Date Return5.40%4.65%
Year-to-Date Return-4.79%15.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.41M1.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.66M1.74M
3-Month Volatility34.94%12.84%
Beta1.690.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ASML

47.13%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, ASML’s Return on Equity of 47.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ASML

29.31%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.31% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ASML

34.90%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 34.90% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)47.13%17.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.27%8.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)29.31%20.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)34.90%26.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.58%48.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

1.41

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

0.22

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.22 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ASML

164.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

ASML’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 164.15 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLLIN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.410.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.790.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.220.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)164.1533.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ASML vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ASML

1.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LIN

1.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ASML

26.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.57% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.01%1.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.57%40.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ASML

26.41

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 26.41 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN

33.69

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 33.69 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ASML

7.74

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 7.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN

6.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.80, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

12.39

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

ASML’s P/B Ratio of 12.39 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ASML vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.4133.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.746.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.395.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.6744.62