ASML vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and IBM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML (289.86 billion USD) and IBM (242.45 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
ASML rides a wilder wave with a beta of 1.22, hinting at bigger swings than IBM’s steadier 0.63.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while IBM sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | International Business Machines Corporation |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Information Technology Services |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Arvind Krishna |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 260.87 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 242.45 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 0.629 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | September 24, 1915 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and IBM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and IBM, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.41 | 44.23 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 8.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.35 | 3.86 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.62 | 9.01 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.63 | 20.31 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.85 | 24.19 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.18 | 4.75 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.05 | 24.98 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ASML at 0.98% and IBM at 2.56% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet IBM’s 2.56% yield, 161% above ASML’s 0.98%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while ASML leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | ASML | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 2.56% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and IBM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while IBM at 5.92 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.01 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 0.97 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 2.49 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.46 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 5.92 |